KAPIL SUTHAR S/O SHRI SHYAM SUNDAR SUTHAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17892/2025 · 2025-11-20
Ashok Kumar Jain
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40417 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40417 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46957] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17892/2025 Kapil Suthar S/o Shri Shyam Sundar Suthar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Kherwada, Tehsil Kherwada, District Udaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Local Self Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Director, Directorate Of Local Bodies, Near 22 Godam Pulia, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Palak Rohila for Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 20/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“The respondents be directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner to give appointment in favour of the petitioner on the post of Fireman in pursuance of the advt. dated 29.12.2015 and in case the petitioner would found in the list of selected candidates then the respondents be directed to give appointment on the post of Fireman with all consequential benefits.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file
[2025:RJ-JP:46957] (2 of 2) [CW-17892/2025] an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the
order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /26