Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40414 (KAR)

SRI HOBYA NAIK v. SMT DRAKSHAYINIBAI

CRL.P/206/2023 · 2025-09-23

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38349 CRL.P No. 206 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 206 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI HOBYA NAIK S/O VILYA NAIK AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/O SHREEHALLI VILLAGE, SHIKARIPURA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577427 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KAMADOLLI MANJULADEVI RAMAPPA, ADVOCATE- ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT DRAKSHAYINIBAI W/O HOBYAN NIKA AGE 42 YEARS 2. PRIYANKA D/O HOBYA NAIKA AGE 19 YEARS 3. HOOVYA NAIK S/O HOBYA NAIKA AGE 17 YEARS 4. HEMANTHA S/O HOBYA NAIKA AGE 15 YEARS Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38349 CRL.P No. 206 of 2023 ALL ARE R/AT AMBARAGOPPA VILLAGE SHIKARIPURA TALUK- 577427 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SINCE THE RESPONDENT NO.3 AND 4 ARE MINORS THEY ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER DRAKSHAYINIBAI RESPONDENT NO.1 …RESPONDENTS (NIL) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C FILED BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COURT THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT SHIVAMOOGA IN CRL.R.P.NO.113/2018 DATED 21.06.2021 AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT SHIKARIPURA IN CRL.MISC.NO.724/2014 DATED 22.11.2018. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. 2. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. 3. Vide order dated 02.07.2025, a conditional order was passed by granting two weeks' time to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38349 CRL.P No. 206 of 2023 passed for dismissal of the petition. Despite the same, the office objections are not complied with. 4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default. 5. In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7