Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40414 (BOM)

Manjusha Nishikant Shinde v. Mohhainmadlliyas Harun Rashid Bhokre

ARP/183/2025 · 2025-07-10

Shri Somasekhar Sundaresan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

6-ARP-183-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 183 OF 2025 Manjusha Nishikant Shinde …Petitioner Versus Mohhainmadlliyas Harun Rashid Bhokre …Respondent Mr. Prasad Avhad i/b Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. DATE : JULY 10, 2025 ORDER : 1. This is a Petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal. 2. It is seen that the Learned Arbitrator came to be appointed by an order dated November 29, 2023. By a letter dated March 25, 2025 the Learned Arbitrator has written to the Petitioner confirming his inability to conduct the arbitration proceedings and that he would unable to commence arbitration as scheduled. 3. Consequently, taking into account the stage at which the Arbitral proceedings are placed, this Petition is finally disposed of extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of twelve months rounded upto June 30, 2026. July 10, 2025 Purti Parab PURTI PRASAD PARAB Digitally signed by PURTI PRASAD PARAB Date: 2025.07.15 15:36:31 +0530 6-ARP-183-2025.doc 4. All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court’s website. [ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] July 10, 2025 Purti Parab