Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40412 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD YUNUS S/O SHRI MOHAMMAD YUSUF v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15642/2025 · 2025-10-13

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41548] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15642/2025 Mohammad Yunus S/o Shri Mohammad Yusuf, Aged About 65 Years, R/o House No. 174, Chelo Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 58, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, State Of Rajasthan, Police Headquarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 3. Police Commissioner, Jaipur Metropolitan, Mi Road, Jaipur. 4. Additional Commissioner Of Police, (Licensing And Legal) Police Commissionerate, M.I. Road, Jaipur. 5. Assistant Commissioner Of Police, Circle Manak Chauk, Hawa Mahal Road, Opposite Old Vidhansabha, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Neetu Bhansali, Adv. For Respondents : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Ms. Megha Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 13/10/2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:- "01. Quashed and set aside the impugned list issued by the respondents qua the petitioner by which application form of the petitioner for issuance of temporary fireworks license has been rejected. 02. The respondents may further be directed to again conduct physical verification of the shop of the petitioner. 03. The respondents may further be directed to issue temporary fireworks [2025:RJ-JP:41548] (2 of 3) [CW-15642/2025] license to the petitioner with immediate effect. 04. Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner applied for licence for Shop No.236-A whereas, the respondents has wrongly mentioned in the rejection order that the petitioner has applied for licence of Shop No.263-A and allowed the inspection of the same and, therefore, wrongly dismissed the aforesaid application. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has also moved an application with the prayer that Shop No.236/236-A be inspected by the respondents, so that needful be done. Learned counsel prays that the present petition be disposed of with the direction to the respondents to inspect Shop No.236/236-A as early as possible and do the needful, as the licence is with regard to shop of fireworks and ‘Diwali’ festival is round the corner. 4. Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and accepts notices on behalf of the respondents. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. In view of aforesaid discussions, the present petition stands disposed of with the direction to the respondents to inspect Shop No.236/236-A, for which the petitioner has applied for licence and also, to decide the application filed on behalf of the petitioner within 2 days from the date of passing of this order. [2025:RJ-JP:41548] (3 of 3) [CW-15642/2025] 7. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. Stay application and any other pending applications also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /09