APHC010619062025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 32024/2025 Between: 1. GELIVI RAMA KRISHNA,, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O. LATE GELIVI VENKATA SUBBAIAH, R/O H.NO. 25/684/149A1, PADMAVATHI NAGAR, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 2. GELIVI MURALI MOHAN,, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O, LATE GELIVI VENKATA SUBBAIAH, R/O, H.NO. 1-245, RAJA STREET, MAIN ROAD, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 3. GELIVI VIJAYA CHANDRA BHANU,, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O. GELIVI KONDAIAH, R/O H.NO. 25-523, SRINIVASA NAGAR, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 4. GELIVI SRINIVASA KALYANA CHAKRAVARTHI,, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O. LATE GELIVI SUBRAMANYAM, R/O H.NO. 29/178-F2- AD, SBI COLONY, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 5. BADRISETTY SIVANANDA PRASAD,, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, S/O. LATE BADRISETTY SHANKARAPPA, R/O H.NO. 3-326, BYRMAL STREET, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 6. BADRISETTY AMARNATH,, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O. LATE BADRISETTY SHANKARAPPA, R/O H.NO. 2-416-B2-3-A, BALAJI COMPLEX, VASAVI TOWER APARTMENTS, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 7. BADRISETTY SAI SARAN TEJA,, AGED ABOUT 33 S/O. BADRISETTY SIVANANDA PRASAD, R/O H.NO. 3-326, BYRMAL STREET, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT. REVENUE STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, 2 AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. TAHSILDAR, NANDYAL URBAN, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, NANDYAL NANDYAL DISTRICT. 6. THE SUBREGISTRAR, NANDYAL NANDYAL DISTRICT. 7. VADDE URUKUNDU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O. VADDE SUNKANNA, R/O. RYTHUNAGARAM VILLAGE, NANDYAL MANDAL AND DISTRICT. 8. VADDE SARADHA, AGED ABOUT 36VEARS W/O. VADDE URUKUNDU, R/O. RYTHUNAGARAM VILLAGE, NANDYAL MANDAL AND DISTRICT. 9. REVANURU KODAVATI SUNIL BABU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O. REVANURU KODAVATI PRASAD, R/O. H. NO. 26-608-Z-5G, SYAM NAGAR, R.S. ROAD, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 10. CHEPPALA INDRAVATHI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, W/O. CHEPPALA VENKATA SIVA RAMI REDDY R/O. H. NO. 29-332-1B, TEKKE, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 11. CHEPPALA UMA MAHESWARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O. CHEPPALA VENKATA SIVA RAMI REDDY R/O. H.NO. 29- 332-1B, TEKKE, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 12. CHEPPALA SARVESHWARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S/O. CHEPPALA VENKATA SIVA RAMI REDDY, R/O. H. NO. 29- 178-64-B-4. NEAR SILPA RAINBOW TOWERS, SBI COLONY, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 13. CHEPPALA SUJATHA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, W/O. CHEPPALA VENKATA SIVA RAMI REDDY R/O. H. NO. 2-60, DURVESI VILLAGE, GADIVEMULA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 14. CHEPPALA SRIKANTH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O. CHEPPALA VENKATA SIVA RAMI REDDY, R/O. DURVESI VILLAGE, GADIVEMULA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of Respondent No.4 to 6 in not considering the Petitioners representation 3 dated 30-10-2025 for keeping the subject property, Sy.No.172/1 pyki an Extent of Ac. 0-75 cents situated in Noonepalle Village, Nandyal Mandal, Nandyal District, in the disputed property registry, despite the pendency of I.A.No.301 of 2025 in OS. No. 552 of 2025 on the file of the Honble Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal, as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and Consequently, direct Respondents No.4 to 6 to include the subject property in the disputed property registry until the final disposal of OS.No.552 of 2025 before the Honble Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal, and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 5 & 6 to include the subject property in Sy.No.172/1 pyki an Extent of Ac.0-75 cents situated in Noonepalle Village, Nandyal Mandal, Nandyal District in the disputed property registry until the disposal of the O.S.No.552 of 2025 on the file of Hon’ble Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal and Pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondents 4 & 6 to consider the Petitioner’s representation dated 30.10.2025 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. TANUSHA VENKATA LAKSHMI KURAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the inaction of Respondent No.4 to 6 in not considering the Petitioners representation dated 30-10-2025 for keeping the subject property, Sy.No.172/1 pyki an Extent of Ac. 0-75 cents situated in Noonepalle Village, Nandyal Mandal, Nandyal District, in the disputed property registry, despite the pendency of I.A.No.301 of 2025 in O.S.No.552 of 2025 on the file of the Hon’ble Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal, as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and Consequently, direct Respondents No.4 to 6 to include the subject property in the disputed property registry until the final disposal of OS.No.552 of 2025 before the Honble Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal, and pass such….” 2. Heard Mrs. Tanusha Venkatalakshmi Kurapati, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for official respondents submitted that the Court may pass appropriate orders in this matter. 4. A perusal of the documents filed along with the Writ Petition, as observed by the Division Bench of this Court and also on perusal of the circular issued by the Chief Commissioner of Land Acquisition 1994 and subsequent amendments to it, without going into the merits of the Writ Petition and with the consent of both side counsel, the Writ 5 Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the very same civil Court where O.S.No.552 of 2025 is pending or before the competent authority either appellate authority or revisional authority under R.O.R.Act. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 10.12.2025 RD 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.32024 of 2025 10.12.2025 RD