[2025:RJ-JP:45259] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13894/2025 Balraj @ Ballu S/o Jaikishan, R/o Old Anaj Mandi, Dantla, Police Station Khairthal-Tijara, District Khairthal-Tijara, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14134/2025 Mahadev @ Chintu @ Rudra S/o Shri Jaydev, R/o 6/209-10, Ambedkar Nagar, P.s. Ambedkar Nagar, South Delhi. (Accused At Present Confined In Jail, Khairthal-Tijara). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 11/11/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.236/2025 registered at Police Station-Khairthal, District-Khairthal-Tijara for the offences under Section 307 of BNS and Section 3/25 Arms Act. 2. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. [2025:RJ-JP:45259] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13894/2025] 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submitted that there has been no recovery from the conscious possession of the accused-petitioner-Balraj @ Ballu. Though there has been a recovery of Rs. 20,000/- from the accused-petitioner- Mahadev @ Chintu @ Rudra but petitioners-Balraj @ Ballu and Mahadev @ Chintu @ Rudra, have been in judicial custody since 20.09.2025 and 12.07.2025, respectively and no test identification parade has been conducted. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the cases may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Balraj @ Ballu S/o Jaikishan and Mahadev @ Chintu @ Rudra S/o Shri Jaydev shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal [2025:RJ-JP:45259] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13894/2025] bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/133-134