DR.LANKAPALLI BULLAYYA COLLEGE, VISAKHAPATNAM v. THE GOVT.OF AP BY SECRETARY, LABOUR EMPLOYMENT & 2 OTHERS
WP/27830/2005 · 2025-04-17
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4040 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4040 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010026952005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Dr.Lankapalli Bullayya College, Visakhapatnam The Govt of AP rep by Secretary Labour Employment and others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following
Sri Ramesh Babu Tatapudi,
learned counsel representing Sri J.Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner communication sent to the petitioner, continue the case. He further submitted that the Writ Petitions nature were dismissed as infructuous. Hence, prayed to pass appropriate orders.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 27830/2005 ankapalli Bullayya College, Visakhapatnam ...PETITIONER AND y Secretary Labour Employment ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): The Court made the following order: Ramesh Babu Tatapudi,
learned counsel representing Sri J.Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that communication sent to the petitioner, there are no instructions from continue the case. He further submitted that the Writ Petitions nature were dismissed as infructuous. Hence, prayed to pass appropriate IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332]
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) Ramesh Babu Tatapudi,
learned counsel representing submitted that in spite of re are no instructions from him to continue the case. He further submitted that the Writ Petitions in similar nature were dismissed as infructuous. Hence, prayed to pass appropriate
2
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause in the Writ Petition still survives, it can file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 17.04.2025 MP
3
82 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 27830 of 2005 Dated:17.04.2025
MP