Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 404 (UTT)

MANEESHA SINGH v. SHAHZAD

SPLA/60/2025 · 2026-04-28

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21. BA] SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS SPLA No.60 of 2025 With CRLA No.137 of 2025 Maneesha Singh Vs. Shahzad Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Ms. Asmi, learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. Mr. Shankar Agarwal, learned counsel for the Respondent. 3. Heard on leave to appeal. 4. There are oral objection on behalf of the respondents. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the grounds are found sufficient to allow the leave to appeal. 6. Leave to appeal is granted. 7. Admit. 8. Lower court record has been received. 9. Registry is directed to prepare the paper book and supply the same to the concerned parties, as per Rules. 10. Let the objection be filed by the respondents within two weeks. 11. List on 09.06.2026 for final hearing. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 28.04.2026 Arti