- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48789-DB W.A. No.46/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT APPEAL NO.46/2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. M.C. VENKATARANGAIAH S/O LATE CHANNAGIRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/OF MADIKENNASANDRA KOTHAGERE HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NAGARAJ D, ADV.,) AND: 1. SRI. M.V. VENKATESH S/O SRI. M.C. VENKATARANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/OF MADIKENNASANDRA KOTHAGERE HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI. M.V. RANGANATH S/O SRI. M.C. VENKATARANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS GOVERNMENT DOCTOR SIRA GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL SIRA, TUMKUR DISTRICT. Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48789-DB W.A. No.46/2023 3. SRI. M.V. NAGARAJ S/O SRI. M.C. VENKATARANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS JANATA CO-OPERATIVE BANK VIJAYANAGARA CLUB VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE. 4. SRI. M.C. RANGASWAMY S/O LATE CHANNAGIRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/OF. MADIKENNASANDRA KOTHAGERE HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT. 5. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION TUMKUR-572101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR R5 R1 TO R3 ARE SERVED NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN R/O R4) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.11.2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP No.65255/2016 (GM-RES) IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE OPERATIVE PORTION AT SL.No.2 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48789-DB W.A. No.46/2023 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) The personal presence of the appellant is taken note of. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 25.11.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. 3. Memo reads as under: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The Appellant most respectfully submits that, as his three sons are taking care of him, the Appellant has been advised to withdraw the above appeal, and accordingly, the Appellant is seeking permission to withdraw the appeal, and the same may be kindly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to take such legal proceedings if the need arises in the interest of justice and equity." 3. Memo is placed on record. 4. In view of the said memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to initiate such action as is permissible in law. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37