Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40396 (AP)

PADMAVATI VENKATA NAGAMALLESWARA RAO v. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

WP/23661/2021 · 2025-10-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010388852021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23661/2021 Between: 1. PADMAVATI VENKATA NAGAMALLESWARA RAO, S/O. LATE VENKATESHWARLU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.50-1-67, PLOT NO. G1, BL, TSR HILL VIEW APARTMENT, ASR NAGAR, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. UPPALA AMMARAO, S/O. KOTESHWAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/O. CHINNAPULIVARRU VILLAGE, KOLLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, REPALLE POLICE STATION, REPALLE RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. VAKA SURYAPRAKASH RAO, S/O. NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER, AGE. 57 YEARS, R/O. KOTI CENTRE, GULLAPALLY GRAMPANCHAYAT, GULLAPALLY, CHERUKUPALLY MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No. 1 in interfering with the civil dispute between the Petitioners and the Respondent No. 4 relating to specific performance of contract in respect of the land to an extent of Ac. 2-00 gts situated Pallapatla Village, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District and disturbing the personal liberty of the Petitioner without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 22 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 1 not to interfere into the civil disputes between the Petitioners and the Respondent No. 4 and not to disturb the personal liberty of the Petitioners and in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 1 not to summon the Petitioners to the Police Station for conducting the civil panchayat in the Police Station without following due process of law in respect of the land to an extent of Ac. 2-00 gts situated Pallapatla Village, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. K RAMA KOTESWARA RAO 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23661 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No. 1 in interfering with the civil dispute between the Petitioners and the Respondent No. 4 relating to specific performance of contract in respect of the land to an extent of Ac. 2-00 gts situated Pallapatla Village, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District and disturbing the personal liberty of the Petitioner without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 22 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 1 not to interfere into the civil disputes between the Petitioners and the Respondent No. 4 and not to disturb the personal liberty of the Petitioners and in the interest of justice.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 29.10.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23661 of 2021 Dated.29.10.2025 UPS 194