f APHC010027042019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI B MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 108 OF 2019 Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., aggrieved by the Judgment dated 02.01.2019 in CrI.A. No.390 of 2015 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari District at Tanuku. Between: Angadala Venkata Naga Malli Laxmi, W/o. Magunta Vara Prasad, Aged about 55 years, Occ; Hindi Pandit, S.H.H.A.U.P.School, O'"* Ward Town, Gudiwada, Penugonda (Post and Mandal) District. Old West Godavari ...Petitioner/Accused AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi. ...1®* Respondent 2. Gudimetia Venugopala Reddy, S/o. Satyanarayana Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Pekeru Village, Iragavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. ...2"'^ Respondent/Complainant lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 397 (1) of Cr.P.C. circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of sentence and awarded by the Court of the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class Tanuku in CC. No.753 of 2011 dated 05.11.2015 IV Additional District and sessions Judge, West Godavari District at Tanuku i: CrI.A. No.390 of 2015, vide judgment dated 02.01.2019. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.S.Murthy, Advocate Counsel for Respondent No.1: The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Counsel for Respondent No.2: - - The Court made the following order: praying that in the conviction as confirmed by the court of in It APHC010027042019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 108/2019 Between: ...PETITIONER A.venkata Naga Malli Laxmi AND State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KS MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: X 2 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the revision petitioner-appellant-accused challenging the judgment dated 02.01.2019 in Criminal Appeal No. 390 of 2015 on the file of the Court of learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari at Tanuku confirming the judgment dated 05-11-2015 in C.C.No. 753 of 2011 on the file of the Court of learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Tanuku, whereby and whereunder respondent No. 2-accused was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-accused submits that the matter has become infructuous. 3. Hence, the criminal revision case is dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand dismissed in consequence. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. The IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari District at Tanuku, West Godavari District, (with records if any 2. The II Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Tanuku, West Godavari District, (with records if any) 3. One CC to Sri K.S.Murthy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CC’s to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra 6. Three CD Copies [OUT] Pradesh. GPC sree HIGH COURT DATED: 18/08/2025 ORDER CRLRC NO. 108 OF 2019 S. 0 9 SEP 2025 ^esPATCH^^ 0\: DISMISSING THIS CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS