APHC010589482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30699/2025 Between: M. Ramanamma and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30699/2025 M. Ramanamma and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.30699 OF 2025 ORDER : 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the action of 2nd respondent in not issuing TDR Certificates to the extent of land acquired by them for the purpose of road widening. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have executed a gift deed dated 13.01.2020 in favour or the 2nd respondent to an extent of 89.211 square yards or 74.590 square meters of their land in Sy.No.188/1 of Madhuravada Village, Visakhapatnam. Though the 2nd respondent has utilized the land for the purpose of road widening and the petitioners have not been issued the TDR Certificates till date. 3. Sri.A.S.C.Bose, the learned standing counsel for the 2nd respondent on written instructions submits that the petitioners had furnished the wrong door number and that on submission of the rectified application mentioned the correct door number. The respondents are willing to issue the TDR Certificates for the extent of land acquired i.e., 72.798 square meters. 4. On the contrary, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners mentioned their door number which is existing before acquisition and after acquisition the same was demolished, as such, they have furnished the door number as was available. 5. Considering the submissions that there is no dispute with regard to execution of gift deed and utilization of the land by the respondent authorities for the purpose of purpose of widening of the road. Considering 3 the submission that the respondent authorities are willing to issue TDR certificates to an extent of 72.798 square meters. The same is acceptable to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off and there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to issue TDR certificates for an extent of 72.798 square meters which was acquired. At any rate, the order of this Court shall be complied within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order. It is also made clear that the 2nd respondent would have to get the appropriate application from the petitioners for processing the same. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 4 206 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.30699 OF 2025 Dated 14.11.2025 KGM