Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34578 RPFC No. 69 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 69 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
MANJUNATHA N., S/O B.NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RESIDING AT DUDUVANAHALLI VILLAGE DINNAHALLI POST, MAASTI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 139 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATARAVANAPAPA M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
BRUNDASHREE G., W/O MANJUNATHA N., AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING AT BYATA VILLAGE, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 140 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAMANJANAIAH H., ADVOCATE)
THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:01.09.2023 PASSED IN CRL. MISC NO.168/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT TUMAKURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF CR.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34578 RPFC No. 69 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
When this matter came up on 29.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, matter was directed to be listed for ‘dismissal’ on 01.09.2025. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, it appears that petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
Accordingly, the RPFC is dismissed for Non- prosecution.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
TS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5