Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40377 (RAJ)

RITA SINDHI W/O LATE SHRI JAIKISHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17058/2025 · 2025-11-14

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46037] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17058/2025 1. Rita Sindhi W/o Late Shri Jaikishan, Aged About 52 Years, R/o D-161, Gali Ni. 4, Indra Colony, Newai, Tonk, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Vivek S/o Late Shri Jaikishan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o D-161, Gali Ni. 4, Indra Colony, Newai, Tonk, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Secretariate, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Department Of Primary Education, Through Secretary Block Iv, Dr. S. Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur- 302015. 3. District Education Officer, 603, V Floor, Block 5, Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur- 302017 (Raj.) 4. Additional Director, State Insurance Provident Fund Department, At 2-2A, Bima Bhawan, Sawai Jai Singh Highway, Banipark, Jaipur- 302006. 5. Chief Block Education Officer (Cbeo), Hemlyawala Road, Toonga, Bassi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. Principal, Rajasthan Senior Secondary School, Dhindhol, Bassi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pranav Pareeks For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr. Parth Sharma Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Mr. Aaditya Godara HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- [2025:RJ-JP:46037] (2 of 3) [CW-17058/2025] “i. By issuing appropriate writ order or direction, to respondents may be directed to release the terminal benefits of Late Shri Jaikishan to the petitioner being his only legal heirs. ii. By issuance of an appropriate writ order or directions to respondents may kindly be directed to decide the applications dated 30.08.2025 and 23.09.2025 (Annexure-3) filed by the petitioners in a time bound manner preferably within 3 months. iii. Any other order or direction as this Hon’ble High Court may deem fair, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may be passed in favour of the petitioners.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve their grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation considering legal position about the grievances, raised by the petitioners. In case of deviation decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if [2025:RJ-JP:46037] (3 of 3) [CW-17058/2025] petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /132