131. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Kamal Kishore State of Punjab CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL 1. respondents to take legal action harassing the pet 2. grievance, the petitioner has given 11.12.2024 to yield any response. It has been submitted that t were under a legal obligation to pass an appropriate order on his complaint. Learned counsel submits that if directions are issued to respondent No. (Rural), District Jalandhar 11.12.2024 accordance with law. 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Kamal Kishore Versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Sunil Kumar Rohilla, Advocate ------ MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to take legal action against respondents No.4 and 5, as they are the petitioner without any reason. Learned counsel for the petitioner grievance, the petitioner has given a (Annexure P-1) to the respondent No. to yield any response. It has been submitted that t were under a legal obligation to pass an appropriate order on his complaint. earned counsel submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Rural), District Jalandhar, to look into the (Annexure P-1) of the petitioner and take appropriate steps in accordance with law. Notice of motion to official respondents only. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17526-2025 Date of decision: 01.04.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondents HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , Advocate, for the petitioner. seeking issuance of directions to the official against respondents No.4 and 5, as they are rned counsel for the petitioner submits that for his a complaint/representation dated respondent No.2, however, it had failed to yield any response. It has been submitted that the official respondents were under a legal obligation to pass an appropriate order on his complaint. the petitioner would be satisfied -Senior Superintendent of Police , to look into the complaint/representation dated of the petitioner and take appropriate steps in Notice of motion to official respondents only. seeking issuance of directions to the official against respondents No.4 and 5, as they are for his representation dated , however, it had failed he official respondents were under a legal obligation to pass an appropriate order on his complaint. the petitioner would be satisfied Senior Superintendent of Police representation dated of the petitioner and take appropriate steps in SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.04.02 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-17526-2025 - 2 - 4. On asking of the Court, Mr. H.S. Deol, Senior DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 5. In the wake of the limited prayer of the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of and respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police (Rural), District Jalandhar, is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate steps, if any required, under the provisions of law. However, if respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the complaint/representation dated 11.12.2024 (Annexure P-1), then the petitioner shall be duly informed as per the parameters laid down by the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Versus Government of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., 2013 (4) RCR (Criminal) 979. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE April 01, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.04.02 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document