Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40375 (AP)

BANDARI SAMELU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/30832/2025 · 2025-11-19

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010586912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 30832/2025 Between: 1. BANDARI SAMELU, S/O. NARASANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. 1-354, SC COLONY, KADIMETIA VILLAGE, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 4. MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. THE KADIMETLA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, KADIMETIA VILLAGE, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of Constitution of India declaring the action of the respondent No. 4 to 6 in not taking action with regard to the erection of statute in Sy No. 392 of Kadimetla Village, Yemmiganur Mandal without obtaining permission from the authorities as illegal, arbitrary and also violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and against the GOMS No. 18 dated 18.02.2013 and also contrary to the Supreme Court order in lA No. 10 of 2012 in SLP No. 8519 of 2006 dated 18.01.2013 and consequently to direct the respondent No. 4 to 6 to remove the statute which is erected in Sy No. 392 of Kadimetla Village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool District and passed necessary orders in the interest of Justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No. 4 to 6 to remove the statute which is erected unauthorizedly in Sy No. 392 of Kadimetia Village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool District and passed necessary orders in the interest of Justice pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGA RAJU KOLLATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.30832 OF 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 20.11.2025 KBN 28 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.30832 of 2025 Date: 20.11.2025 KBN