Sungandhi Kumari @ Suganta Kumari v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./30161/2025 · 2025-07-30
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40372 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40372 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30161 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1575 Year-2023 Thana- BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Sungandhi Kumari @ Suganta Kumari Daughter of Rajnath Yadav @ Munna Yadav Village- Belauti Ps- Sahpur, Dist- Bhojpur Ara ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Ranjay Kumar son of Chandrama Yadav Village- chandwa Ps- Ara, Nawada, Dist- Ara bhojpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Neeraj Kumar Alias Sanidh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Renuka Ratnakar , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 30-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case , daughter of informant was married with co-accused Rakesh Kumar in the year 2019 and after the marriage , she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by all the accused persons due to non-fulfillment of additional demand of dowry and ultimately the accused persons committed the murder of informant’s daughter.
4. Petitioner is unmarried nanad of the deceased.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30161 of 2025(3) dt.30-07-2025 2/2 There is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner. It is further orally submitted that thrust of accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody . Petitioner is separate in mess and property and got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner.
6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Ara at Bhojpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 1575 of 2023 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure .
Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T