SONIA DEVI v. UNION OF INDIA TH SECRTARY MINISTRY INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2090/2025 · 2025-08-04
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4037 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4037 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No. 2090/2025 CM No. 4766/2025
Sonia Devi
..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Pawan K. Kundal, Advocate
Vs
Union of India and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :-
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 04.08.2025
There are many typographical errors while drafting the instant petition and the petition is deficient in pleadings and when the learned counsel for the petitioner was confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, he seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with a liberty to file petition with better pleadings. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 04.08.2025 Mihul
Sr. No. 158 Mihul Singh 2025.08.04 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document