KALAHASTI PADMA, & 19 OTHERS, v. PRL.SECY., SOCIAL WELFARE DEPT., HYD., & 5 OTHERS,
WP/36643/2014 · 2025-12-02
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40363 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40363 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010298782014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 36643/2014 Between:
1. KALAHASTI PADMA, & 19 OTHERS,, D/O RAGHURAM, AGED 17 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT B.SC 1ST YEAR BEING MINOR, REP. BY HER NATURAL, GUARDIAN AND FATHER RAGHURAM S/O PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURAL LABOUR, R/O WEST GOGULAPALLI ALLURI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
2. ORUMPATI VENKATA KALYAN, S/O MORARJI, AGED 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, 1ST YEAR B.COM R/O WEST GOGULAPALLI, ALLURI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
3. YARASI SABARESH,, S/O SRINIVASULU AGED 23 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT MCA 1ST YEAR R/O EAST GOGULAPALLI, ALLURI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. SINIGI MALLAIAH,, S/O PARAMESWARAIAH, AGED 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, B.TECH 1ST YEAR R/O EAST GOGULAPALLI, ALLURI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
5. ATA SURENDRA BABU,, S/O JANARDHAN, AGED 17 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT B.TECH 1ST YEAR, BEING MINOR, REP. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FATHER A.JANARDHAN, S/O MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURAL LABOUR R/O WEST GOGULAPALLI, ALLURI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
6. KALAHASTHI KRISHNAVENI,, D/O SEENAIAH AGED 17 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, 1ST YEAR B.COM BEING MINOR, REP. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FATHER SRI K.SEENAIAH, S/O VENKULU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURAL LABOUR R/O WEST GOGULAPALLI, ALLURI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
2
7. THAMBI NAVEEN,, S/O MASTHANAIAH, AGED 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, 1ST YEAR B.COM R/O C.R.PALEM, BOGOLU MANDA SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
8. KALAHASTHI RAMA,, D/O THIRUPATHAIAH AGED 19 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, B.SC. 1ST YEAR R/O WEST GOGULAPALLI, ALLURI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
9. ATA MASTHANAIAH,, S/O SEENAIAH, AGED 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT 1ST YEAR B.COM R/O WEST GOGULAPALLI, ALLURI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
10. PURINI VENU,, S/O THIRUPATHAIAH AGED 21 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, 1ST YEAR B.COM R/O WEST GOGULAPALLI, ALLURI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT R/O WEST GOGULAPALLI, ALLURI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
11. PUCHALLAPALLI MADHURI,, D/O SREENIVASULU AGED 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, 1ST YEAR B.PHARM R/O SAMBHIRUPALEM, ISKAPALLI POST, ALLURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 12. NATARU SRILATHA,, D/O VENKATARAMANAIAH AGED 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, 1ST YEAR B.COM R/O SAMBHIRUPALEM, ISKAPALLI POST, ALLURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 13. VALAMETI SUREKHA,, D/O NAGAMANI AGED 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT 1ST YEAR B.SC. EAST STREET, ALLURU, ALLURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 14. PUCHALAPALLI SOUNDARYA,, D/O SEENAIAH AGED 18 YEARS, OCC.
STUDENT, R/O SAMBUNIPALEM, ISAKAPALLI POST, ALLURI MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
15. PUCHALAPALLI NAGAMANI,, D/O SUBBARAO AGED 22 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, M.COM I YEAR R/O SAMBUNIPALEM, ALLURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 16. PUCHALAPALLI ADILAKSHMAMMA,, D/O VENKATARAMANAIAH AGED 23 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, B.ED I YEAR R/O SAMBUNIPALEM, ALLURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 17. GOURAVARAPU JHANSI,, S/O G.ANASUYAMMA AGED 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, I YEAR B.TECH, R/O SAMBUNIPALEM, ALLURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3
18. PUCHALAPALLI BALASUBRAMANYAM,, S/O RAVI AGED 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, B.COM I YEAR. R/O SAMBUNIPALEM, ALLURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 19. GOURAVARAPU ANIL KUMAR,, S/O YELLAIAH AGED 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, B.COM I YEAR R/O SAMBUNIPALEM, ALLURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 20. PURINI HARI KRISHNA,, S/O THIRUPATHAMMA AGED 19 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, I YEAR B.COM R/O SAMBUNIPALEM, ALLURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) A N D
1. PRL SECY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPT HYD 5 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT SAMKSHEMA BHAVAN, MASAB TANK HYDERABAD. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P.
4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
5. THE TAHSILDAR, ALLURE MANDAL ALLURE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
6.
THE TAHSILDAR BOGULU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders or direction or a writ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents in not receiving the application forms for issuance of fees reimbursement under the E.B.C. category is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to receive the application forms from the Petitioners by changing the programme in the Online System and forward the applications of the Peititoners to consider the issuance of fees reimbursement under the E.B.0 category and to pass
4 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 45860 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive the Online Applications without insisting for nativity certificate option in the system and also direct the Respondents to extend the last date for submitting the application forms to enable the Petitioners to submit the filled in application form pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass
IA NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP 221077 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KIRAN TIRUMALASETTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP)
2.
GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following:
5 O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to declare the action of respondents in not receiving the application forms for issuance of fees reimbursement under the E.B.C. Category as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to receive the application forms from the petitioners by changing the programme in the Online System and forward the applications of the petitioners to consider the issuance of fees reimbursement under the E.B.C. Category. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Hemanth Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of M/s.Kiran Tirumalasetti, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _ _____________
_ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 3rd December, 2025. DNB