Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010527832023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5653/2023 Between:
1. SMT.VAJRAPU ANNAPURNA, W/O. ISSAKU, AGE 57 YEARS, OCC. ANGANWADI WORKER (UNDER TERMINATION),
R/O.
RAMESAMPETA ANGANWADI CENTER, KOTAPADU VILLAGE, RANGAMPET MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. SMT K MADHAVI LATHA, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTEE OF ANGANWADI WORKERS, RAJA MAHENDRAVARA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. SMT A VIJAYA LAKSHMI, THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN AND
CHILD WELFARE
DEPARTMENT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. SMT JANGA JESSI FLORENCE, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ICDS PROJECT, RANGAMPET, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to my be pleased to summon the contemnors for their wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order passed by Honourbale Court in Dt. 28-03 2023 passed in W.P.No. 7010 of 2023 and to punish them as per law and pass such
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DEVAKUMAR SALIKITI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. S APPADHARA REDDY
2. U KANAKA RAJU WRIT PETITION NO: 7010/2023 Between:
1. VAJRAPU ANNAPURNA, W/O. ISSAKU, AGE 57 YEARS, OCC. ANGANWADI WORKER (UNDER TERMINATION),
R/O.
RAMESAMPETA ANGANWADI CENTER, KOTAPADU VILLAGE, RANGAMPET MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR, WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, JAMPANI TOWERS, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTEE OF ANGANWADI WORKERS, RAJAMAHENDRAVARA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ICDS PROJECT, RANGAMPET, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Writ, order or orders specially one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 3rd Respondent in terminating
3
the petitioner vide proceedings Ref.No.72/A/2022 dated 20-10-2022 with retrospective effect i.e., from 23-11-2020 without issuing any notice or affording opportunity of hearing from the post of Angawadi Worker, Ramesampeta Anganwadi Center, Code No.84 of Kotapadu village of Rangampeta Mandal of East Godavari District is highly illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the guidelines issued by the Government and judgments of the this Hon'ble Court and also violation of principles of natural justice apart from violating the Article 14,16 and 21 of Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to allow to perform her duties as anganiwadi worker in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner for dischargin2 her duties as Angawadi Worker, Ramesampeta Anganwadi Center, Code No.84 of Kotapadu village of Rangampeta Mandal of East Godavari District duly suspending the proceedings Ref.No.72/A/2022 dated 20-10-2022 of the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition. IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to vacate the interim order passed in W.P.No.7010 of 2023 dt:28.03.2023 and dismiss the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DEVAKUMAR SALIKITI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following:
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5653/2023 AND WRIT PETITION NO.7010/2023 COMMON ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:-
“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 3rd respondent in terminating the petitioner vide proceedings Ref.No.72/A/2022 dated 20.10.2022 with retrospective effect i.e., from 23.11.2020 without issuing any notice or affording opportunity of hearing from the post of Angawadi Worker, Ramesampeta Anganwadi Center, Code No.84 of Kotapadu Village of Rangampeta Mandal of East Godavari District is highly illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the guidelines issued by the Government and judgments of this Hon’ble Court and also violation of principles of natural justice apart from violating the Article 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to allow to perform her duties as Anganwadi worker in the interest of justice and pass such other order. 2. This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 28.03.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7010 of 2023. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court passed an interim order dated 28.03.2023 in W.P.No.7010 of 2023, which is extracted hereunder:
5
“Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Government Pleader for Services appearing for the respondents. There shall be an interim suspension of the impugned proceedings dated 20.10.2022 issued by the 3rd respondent and the respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to discharge her duties as Anganwadi Worker, Ramesampeta Anganwadi Center, Code No.84, Kotapadu Village of Rangampeta Mandal, East Godavari District, until further orders. List the matter after two weeks for filing counter.”
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that even though this Court passed an interim order dated 28.03.2023 directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to discharge her duties as Anganwadi worker, the respondents did not comply with the order of this Court. Hence, the Contempt Case is filed. 6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of the order of this Court dated 28.03.2023, the respondents issued a speaking order dated 22.11.2025 reinstating the petitioner and the petitioner has also joined duty on 21.11.2025. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner also admitted the same. He further submits that since the respondents complied with the order of this Court, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is
6
necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. 8. Recording the said submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. 9. The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
08.12.2025 TTPPSS
7
183 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5653/2023 AND WRIT PETITION NO.7010/2023
08.12.2025 TTPPSS