Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40357 (KAR)

SRI. L KODHANDARAMU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19406/2025 · 2025-08-21

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32659 WP No. 19406 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19406 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. L KODHANDARAMU S/O LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT SWADHENAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR 572 101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHOKKAREDDY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA UNDER SECRETARY OF REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560 001 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR LAND RECORDS TECHNICAL DIRECTOR TO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR - 572 101 3. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION TUMKUR 572 101 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32659 WP No. 19406 of 2025 4. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION TUMKUR - 572 101 5. TAHSILDAR TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR - 572 101 6. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER JILLA PANCHAYATH TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR - 572 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SESHU.V., HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION PRAYING TO DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT NO.3 FOR CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION AS ANNEXURE-A, DATED 08-09-2023 FOR CONDUCTING PHODI AND HADHBASTH SY.NO.73/1 AND SY.NO.73/2 OF SWADHENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, BY ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32659 WP No. 19406 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP takes notice for all the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has today furnished a copy of endorsement dated 09.07.2025 issued by the Assistant Director of Land Records, respondent No.3 and submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructous. However, liberty is sought to raise a challenge to the endorsement issued by respondent No.3. 3. Accordingly the writ petition stands disposed of while reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise a challenge to the endorsement dated 09.07.2025 issued by respondent No.3. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26