Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40357 (AP)

GOLLAPALLI PRABHAKARA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/24028/2025 · 2025-11-16

D Ramesh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DR,J WP.No.24028 of 2025 APHC010471652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 24028 OF 2025 Between: 1. GOLLAPALLI PRABHAKARA RAO, S/o. Arjuna Rao, aged 59 years, Occ Daily Labour, R/o D.No.4-95, Gopal Nagar, Sabbavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District (earlier Visakhapatnam District). ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Through the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Anakapalli District, Anakapalli, (earlier Visakhapatnam District). 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anakapalli District (earlier Visakhapatnam District). 4. The Tahsildar, Sabbavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District, (earlier Visakhapatnam District). 5. The Station House Officer, Sabbavaram PS, Anakapalli District, (earlier Visakhapatnam District). DR,J WP.No.24028 of 2025 6. The Sabbavaram Gram Panchayat, Sabbavaram, Sabbavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District (earlier Visakhapatnam District), Represented by its Panchayat Secretary. 7. Pillala Demudu, S/o Late Appalanaidu, aged 54 years, R/o Gopal Nagar, Sabbavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District (earlier Visakhapatnam District). 8. Munampaka Sathyannarayana, S/o. Late Demudu, aged 50 years, R/o. Iruvada Village, Kummara BC Colony, Sabbavaram Mandal, Anakapalli.District, (earlier Visakhapatnam District). 9. Munampaka Rajya Lakshmi, W/o. Sathyannarayana, aged 45 years, R/o. Iruvada Village, Kummara BC Colony, Sabbavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District, (earlier Visakhapatnam District). ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, writ, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents, more particularly Respondents 3 to 5, in trying to demolish the building in Plot No.70, admeasuring Ac.0.03 cents in Survey No.27T of Sabbavaram Village and Mandal, Anakapalli District (earlier Visakhapatnam District), as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 5 not to demolish the petitioners property in Plot No.70, admeasuring Ac.0.03 cents in Survey No.271 of Sabbavaram Village and Mandal, Anakapalli District (earlier Visakhapatnam District), and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE DR,J WP.No.24028 of 2025 The Court made the following ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________ JUSTICE D RAMESH Date: 17.11.2025 Dvs DR,J WP.No.24028 of 2025 137 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 24028 OF 2025 Date: 17.11.2025 Dvs