APHC010589042025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30535/2025 Between: 1. P. RAMA APPARAO,, S/O. LATE APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.8-11/1, KONDAAVALASA, RH COLONY, AGANAMPUDI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DUWADA POLICE STATION, KURMANNAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. SRI BALIREDDY SATYANARAYANA, S/O. LATE APPALA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 8-5, KONDAYYAVALASA, RH COLONY, AGANAMPUDI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. SRI BANDARU CHANDU RAMESH, S/O. LATE BANDARU RAJU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 8-149, KONDAYYAVALASA, RH COLONY, AGANAMPUDI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. SMT VADDADI BHAVANI, W/O. SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 7-171, KONDAYYAVALASA, RH COLONY, AGANAMPUDI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. SRI VADDADI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. LATE BABURAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 7-171, KONDAYYAVALASA, RH COLONY, AGANAMPUDI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. SRI PALAKA ATCHYUTA RAO, S/O. LATE MANIKYAM, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 7-11/1, KONDAYYAVALASA, RH COLONY, AGANAMPUDI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 9. SRI VADDADI VARAPRASAD, S/O. LATE BABURAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 7-171, KONDAYYAVALASA, RH COLONY, AGANAMPUDI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not registering the complaint dt. 28.10.2025 made by the petitioner against the respondents no. 4 to 9 is as illegal, arbitrary, violation of rt. 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provision of BNS as well as Information Technology Act, 2002 and consequently direct the 3rd to register the above complaint made by the petitioner.” 2. Heard Sri NarasimhuluParise, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.11.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30535 of 2025 Dt.10.11.2025 Asr