MURARI LAL SHARMA S/O SHRI DAMODAR PRASAD SHARMA v. THE UNION OF INDIA
CW/16575/2025 · 2025-12-10
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40350 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40350 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50282] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16575/2025 Murari Lal Sharma S/o Shri Damodar Prasad Sharma, Aged About 65 Years, (Senior Citizen) Plot No. -86, Padam Vihar Near Chhoki Dhani Tonk Road, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Labour Employment Government Of India, Secretariat, New Delhi India.
2. The Commissioner/ Regional Officer Employee Provident Fund Organization, R/o Vqww-5X3, Nidhi Bhawan, Vidyut Marg, Jyothi Nagar, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shruti Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 10/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is therefore prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate
order
or
direction (i) The Respondnet may kindaly be directed conider the representation as well as notice for demand of justice in the direction passed in the case of Pawan meena versus State of Raj S B Civil Writ pettion no 1665/2024 diecided on 02-02-2024 (ii) And respondnet may kindly be directed to start his PF Pension since his retirement with arrear with interest or complete all office level formalities
with
in
as
earlist (iii) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem just and proper in the facts of the present case may also be passed in favor of the petitioner..”
[2025:RJ-JP:50282] (2 of 2) [CW-16575/2025]
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /41