BBF INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. STATE TH.LABOUR EMPLOYMENT DEPTT.AND ORS.
WP(C)/2251/2019 · 2025-08-07
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4035 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4035 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No.2251/2019
BBF Industries Limited
..... Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
Vs
State of J&K and others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 07.08.2025
The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last three consecutive dates of hearing i.e. 23.04.2024, 04.07.2024 and 20.03.2025 and same is the position even today. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition which is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s).
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 07.08.2025 Shammi Sr. No. 10 SHAMMI KUMAR 2025.08.07 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document