- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34450 WP No. 32415 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 32415 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SUBBALAKSHMAMMA K WO LATE H.V. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS RESIDING AT HANIYUR VILLAGE HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK BANGALORE - 562 163. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. NETHRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHIVAKUMAR D.A, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK YELAHANKA MINI VIDHANASOWDA BANGALORE - 560 064. 3. SRI. RUDRESH V S/O LATE VERUPAKSHAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34450 WP No. 32415 of 2024 RESIDING AT 8TH MAIN SHETTIHALLI MAIN ROAD JAYANAGARA EAST, TUMKURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 572 102. 4. SRI. T. TIMMARAJU S/O THIPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT KAKOLU VILLAGE RAJANUKUNTE MAIN ROAD HESARAGHATTA HOBLI YELAHANKA TALUK BANGALORE - 562 163. 5. SRI. SOMASHEKAR REDDY S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED 48 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.55, MADAPPANAHALLI MAIN ROAD RAJANUKUNTE, HESRARGHATTA HOBLI YELAHANKA TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE R-2, PERUSE THE SAME DIRECT TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 09.01.2024 IN RRT(DIS) CR./921/2023-24 PASSED BY THE R-1 - SPECIAL TASILDHAR, YELAHANKA TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34450 WP No. 32415 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Notice to respondent Nos.3 to 5 is not necessary for the following reasons. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved of the impugned order at Annexure-A dated 09.01.2024 passed by the Special Tahsildar, Yelahanka Taluk, Bengaluru. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the petitioner cannot raise a challenge to such an order passed by the Tahsildar under Chapter XI of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, in respect of entries in the record of rights. The petitioner will have to raise a challenge to such an order in a manner known to law, as provided in the same chapter. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34450 WP No. 32415 of 2024 4. Upholding the submissions of the learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition stands disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise a challenge to the impugned order passed by the Tahsildar in a manner known to law. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5 CT: BHK