Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:30832-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 573 of 2025 Susanta Jana, aged about 32 years, son of Dipak Jana, resident of Ashok Nagar, P.O. & P.S. Argora, District Ranchi .... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Hriday Ranjan Pathak, son of not known to the petitioner, resident of Village Maduatand, P.O. & P.S. Jhumri Telaiya, District Koderma 3. Kusum Pathak, wife of Hriday Ranjan Pathak, resident of Village Maduatand, P.O. & P.S. Jhumri Telaiya, District Koderma 4. Miss Molshi Pathak, resident of House No. 47B, Ashok Nagar, Road No. 1, P.O. & P.S. Ashok Nagar, District Ranchi … Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shrestha Gautam, Advocate Mr. Rahul Anand, Advocate Mr. Himanshu Harsh, Advocate For the State : A.C. to Mr. Indranil Bhaduri, S.C.-IV For the Respondents-2&3: Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocate --- Order No. 10 Dated 24th September, 2025 Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. The instant writ application has been filed with the following prayers: a. For issuance of appropriate writ/writs or order/orders or direction/ directions or a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus commanding upon the Respondents, particularly Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, to produce the detenu before this Hon’ble Court and set her at liberty from illegal and unlawful confinement; And b. Pass any other order/orders or direction/ directions as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. In course of the proceedings, the respective parties were asked to physically appear before this Court, which they did and an order was passed on 08.09.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents No. 2 and 3 while submitting that it has been mentioned therein that the daughter of the respondents No. 2 and 3, namely, Isha Pathak is a major girl and she is free to go for her further studies on her own will and the said respondents do not have any objection to the same. Based on the averments made in the counter affidavit filed by the respondents No. 2 and 3, it has been submitted the writ application be disposed of as the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. In view of the said submission as well as the averments made in the counter affidavit filed by the respondents No. 2 and 3, this writ application stands disposed of. (RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.) (PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.) 24.09.2025 MK Page|2