Urmila Ingale 58-wp-7659-25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7659 OF 2025 Maharashtra Rajya Zilha Parishad Aarogya Seva Karmachari Sanghatna .. Petitioner VS. The State of Maharashtra through Sec. Rural Dev. Dept. and ors. .. Respondents Mr. Amey Deshpande, for the Petitioner. Ms.Rupali Shinde, AGP for Respondents No.1 & 2 – State. CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, AND N.R.BORKAR, JJ. DATE : JUNE 17, 2025 P.C.: 1. The petitioner -Sanghatna is challenging the corrigendum by which the transfers effected by the Zilla Parishad have been cancelled. Learned counsel for the petitioner raised various contentions in support of the petitioner’s case. Prima facie, we are of the opinion that the writ petition at the behest of the petitioner-Sanghatna in the matter of decision as regards the transfer of the employees may not be maintainable. The 1/2 URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2025.06.18 19:16:00 +0530 Urmila Ingale 58-wp-7659-25.doc employees can always raise individual grievance if they are aggrieved by the cancellation of their transfer orders. The representation dated 25/05/2025 preferred by the petitioner- Sanghatna against the issuance of the corrigendum is pending before respondents no. 1 & 4. It is open for the petitioner- Sanghatna to pursue the representation made by them on behalf of the employees with the competent authority and competent authority undoubtedly will look into the representation and take such decision as may be advised. 2. Keeping all contentions open, the writ petition is disposed of. ( N.R.BORKAR, J.) (M.S.KARNIK, J.) 2/2