APHC010771312016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22925/2016 Between: 1. SMT.M.MEENAKSHI,, W/O.LATE C.MARAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEWIFE, R/O.D.NO.9/93, DAMINEDU VILLAGE, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHITTOOR DISTRICT, - 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR CUM SETTLEMENT OFFICER CHITTOOR DIST, - 4. THE TAHSILDAR TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT, - ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing the order vide proceedings Roc.F1/134/2015 dated 31-08-2015 cancelling the orders of the 3rd respondent vide proceedings D.Dis.No.F1.5993/2011 dated 01-09-2014, without issuing any notice and opportunity of. hearing to the petitioner and without jurisdiction, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 2 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the order vide proceedings Roc.F1/134/2015 dated 31-08-2015 of the 2nd respondent as irrational and unconstitutional and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 28201 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order vide proceedings Roc.F1/134/2015 dated 31-08-2015 issued by the 2nd respondent, pending final disposal of the main writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave of Respondent No.2 to file counter affidavit in the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VMR LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 The Court made the following Order: Sri T.Ashok Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Date 14.11.2025 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22925/2016 Date 14.11.2025 KA