Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40333 (AP)

THE SWATHI ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTIONS v. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS

CC/69/2025 · 2025-11-20

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010009472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 69/2025 Between: 1. THE SWATHI ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTIONS, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, S. VENUGOPAL REDDY, S/O. KOTA REDDY, AGED ABOUT.65 YEARS, R/O. PLOT NO. 201, VENKATADARI APARTMENTS, SANTHOSH NAGAR, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI B RAJASEKHAR IAS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND MARKETING MKTGII DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. A VIJAYASUNEETHA IAS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING DAYANAND NAGAR, GUNTUR, 2 HBKM,J C.C.No.69 of 2025 GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SRI B BALUNAIK, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 6. SRI G BRAHMAIAH, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. SRI G RATNABABU, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PR.PIU DIVISION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to call the contemnors herein and to punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience and deliberately violating the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 9452 of 2024 dated 01.10.2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to dispense with filing certified copy of judgment dated 01.10.2024passed in W.P. No. 9452 of 2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT SAILENDRA G Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM 2. . 3 HBKM,J C.C.No.69 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt has already been complied with. For which, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1, 2, 6 and 7 produces the instructions from the 7th respondent dated 20.11.2025. 2. In view of the same, as no cause survives, this Contempt Case is closed. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. The written instructions of the 7th respondent shall be made as part of the Court record. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 21.11.2025 PGT