LIYAKAT ALI KHAN S/O TAJU KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/4774/2020 · 2025-07-31
Anand Sharma, K R Shriram
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40328 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40328 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29293-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil (PIL) Writ Petition No. 4774/2020
1. Liyakat Ali Khan S/o Taju Khan, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Plot No. 97, Jagannathpuri-A, 200 Feet Road, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur
2. Iqbal Khan S/o Phuse Khan, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Plot No. 200-B, Sanjay Nagar-D, Jhotwara, Jaipur
3. Shabbir Khan S/o Sadul Khan, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Plot No. 17, 18, Jagannathpuri-A, 200 Feet Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur
4. Muzaffer Ali Khan S/o Shadulia Khan, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Plot No. 13, Sanjay Nagar-E, Jhotwara, Jaipur
5. Islam Khan S/o Bhanvaru Khan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Plot No. 15, Sanjay Nagar-E, Jhotwara, Jaipur
6. Bhanvaru Khan S/o Shabaj Khan, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Plot No. 114, Jagannathpuri-A, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur
7. Yasin Khan S/o Musraf Khan, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Plot No. 487, Sanjay Nagar-B, Jhotwara, Jaipur
8. Tofik Khan S/o Ibrahim Khan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Plot No. 117, Sanjay Nagar-C, 200 Feet Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur
9. Ajaj Nabi S/o Salemuddin Khan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Plot No. 87, Chaman Badi, Jhotwara, Jaipur
10. Aliyas Khan S/o Abdul Rajak Khan, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Plot No. 342B-1, Jagannathpuri, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur
11. Capt. Hafiz Khan S/o Niyaz Mohammad Khan, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Plot No. 218, Sanjay Nagar-B, Aman Street, Jhotwara, Jaipur
12. Hasim Khan Pahadan S/o Gulab Khan Pahadan, Aged About 62 Years, R/o E-71, Barkat Colony, Jhotwara, Jaipur
13. Ashok S/o Laxmi Narayan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Plot No. 124A, Jagannathpuri-A, 200 Feet Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur
14. Intijar Ali S/o Ibrahim Khan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Plot No. 117, Sanjay Nagar-C, 200 Feet Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur
[2025:RJ-JP:29293-DB] (2 of 3) [CW-4774/2020] ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Jaipur Development Authority, Jln Marg, Jaipur Through Its Commissioner
3. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jaipur
4. Dy. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Vidhyadhar Nagar Zone, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aslam Khan, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, Additional Advocate General with Ms. Shikha Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Yuvraj Samant, Advocate with Ms. Neha Amola, Advocate. Mr. Aditya Pareek Advocate on behalf of Mr. Saket Pareek, Advocate. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.R. SHRIRAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 31/07/2025
1.
Counsel for petitioners states that in affidavit in reply filed by authorities, there is an admission that there are encroachments. There are some pending applications also by private parties who seek to be impleaded. 2. Whether there are encroachments and to what extent and by whom have to be examined by authorities concerned. 3. Counsel for petitioners states that way back in 2019, authorities had issued notices to various private individuals calling upon them to show cause as to why they should not be termed as encroachers/removal of encroachments, no action has been taken. [2025:RJ-JP:29293-DB] (3 of 3) [CW-4774/2020]
4. Mr. G.S. Gill, Additional Advocate General states that within four weeks, action will be initiated in furtherance of show cause notice already issued and to the extent notices have not been issued to certain encroachers, now notices will be issued within four weeks. 5. Respondents are directed to complete process and remove encroachments, if there are any, by 31st December 2025. Copies of notices issued shall be made available to petitioners and if there is any personal hearing given petitioners shall also be heard. 6. Petition disposed. (ANAND SHARMA),J (K.R. SHRIRAM),CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT /25