- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38344 HRRP No. 13 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION No.13 OF 2023 (EVI) BETWEEN: NARASIMHA RAO SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR’S 1. PADMA BAI AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS W/O LATE NARASIMHA RAO 2. N.SUNIL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O LATE NARASIMHA RAO 3. N.DEEPAK KUMAR AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O LATE NARASIMHA RAO 4. N.PRAVEEN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O LATE NARASIMHA RAO ALL ARE R/OF NO.90, 1ST MAIN 1ST CROSS, SRIRAMANAGARA TIPATURU-572 101 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI S.S.PARIKSHIT, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38344 HRRP No. 13 of 2023 AND: SIDDANANJAPPA, DEAD BY LRS 1. SAVITHRAMMA W/O LATE SIDDANANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, 2. MANJUNATHA T S S/O LATE SIDDANANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 3. HARISH KUMAR T S S/O LATE SIDDANANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 4. HEMALATHA T S S/O LATE SIDDANANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NO.481, KALLAPPASHETTY COMPOUND, B H ROAD CROSS, TIPATURU-572 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI GIRISHA.N.R, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R4; VIDE ORDER DATED 11.07.2025, NOTICE TO R2 AND R3 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS HRRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 46(1) OF KARNATAKA RENT ACT 1999 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.08.2023 PASSED IN RRP.NO.10001/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKUR (SITTING AT TIPTUR) ALLOWING AND SETTING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.11.2021 PASSED IN HRC NO.02/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (Jr. Dn) AND JMFC, TIPTUR. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38344 HRRP No. 13 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo which reads as under: “It is hereby prayed that the above petitioner may kindly be permitted to withdraw the above petition with a liberty to file fresh suit and adjudicate the issue in fresh suit in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Placing the memo on record, petition is permitted to be withdrawn. It is made clear that the petitioners are entitled to establish their right before the Civil Court in an appropriate suit. 3. Needless to emphasize that if any such suit is filed, Civil Court having wider jurisdiction in regard to the rights of the parties shall adjudicate the intended suit in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations made by the Rent Court. 4. In view of the above, following: ORDER Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 82