- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33232 MFA No. 4963 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4963 OF 2025 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MR. CHANDRASHEKAR, S/O. AYYAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/A. GOPAL REDDY BUILDING, SINGENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, HUSKUR POST, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL – 560 099. 2. SMT. VIMALAMMA, W/O. AYYAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/A. NO.45, SINGENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, HUSKUR POST, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL – 560 099. 3. SMT. SHUBHA, W/O. LATE RAMESH REDDY, D/O. AYYAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/A. KALLAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL - 560 099 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SUBBA REDDY K.N., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33232 MFA No. 4963 of 2025 AND: 1. SRI. SHYAMASUNDAR, S/O. AYYAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/A. SINGENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, HUSKUR POST, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL – 560 099 2. MR. AYYAPPA REDDY, S/O. LATE GURAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, R/A. NO.45, SINGENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, HUSKUR POST, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL – 560 099 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MANJUNATH K.V., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 ON IA.2 IN CP 9676/2025) THIS MFA FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.04.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 IN OS.NO.329/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.2 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Appellant Nos.1, 2 and 3 and respondent No.1 are present before the Court and filed a joint memo of compromise - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33232 MFA No. 4963 of 2025 stating that they have settled the matter with each other only insofar as the suit property item Nos.2 and 5. 2. Upon enquiry they have stated that, on their own will and volition, they have entered into settlement and accordingly, filed a joint memo. 3. Accordingly, joint memo is placed on record. 4. The compromise effected is only in respect of suit property item Nos.2 and 5 is concerned. 5. Accordingly, appeal is disposed of. SD/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68