SMT. SUREKHA SANJAY RANE AND ANR. v. SMT. MANGALA PANDURANG PATIL AND ORS.
WP/7676/2017 · 2025-02-04
Shri Amit Borkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40321 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40321 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
901-wp7676-2017.doc VRJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7676 OF 2017 Surekha Sanjay Rane & Anr. … Petitioners V/s. Mangala Pandurang Patil & Ors. … Respondents Mr. A. S. Rao for the petitioner. Ms. Vrishali Raje for the State-respondent No.6. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 4, 2025 P.C.:
1. The petitioners are challenging an order passed by respondent No.1 refusing to grant interim relief during pendency of the revision application. However, the impugned order appears to have been passed in the year 2017. Hence, at this stage, it is not necessary to consider the writ petition on merits. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs.
2. All contentions raised by the petitioners are kept to be agitated in appropriate proceedings.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.) 1 VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Digitally signed by VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Date: 2025.02.04 20:01:55 +0530