IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.223 of 2022 ====================================================== National Insurance Company Limited, Regional Branch Office through its Authorized Signatory, Rana Ranjan, aged about 37 Years,Male, A.O. National Insurance Co. Ltd., Regional Offoce, 4th Floor, Sone Bhawan, Patna. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. Sandhya Devi Wife of Sri Ramchandra Mehta. Resident of Village-Sonhouli, P.O.-Sanhouli, P.S.-Chitragupta Nagar, District-Khagaria. 2. Ramchandra Mehta Son of Late Yadu Mehta. Resident of Village-Sonhouli, P.O.-Sanhouli, P.S.-Chitragupta Nagar, District-Khagaria. 3. Sanjay Kumar Yadav Son of Nagheshwar Yadav At and P.O.-Kharik, P.S.- Kharik, District-Bhagalpur-812001. (owner of the Vehicle-Br-10GA/2012) ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Kumar Pankaj, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. Tulika Srivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 15-09-2025 Heard Mr. Kumar Pankaj, learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. The present appeal has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for setting aside the judgment dated 17.08.2021 passed in Claim Case No.01/2017 passed by Shri Kumud Ranjan Singh, District and Sessions Judge-cum-Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Khagaria whereby and whereunder the learned Tribunal has directed this appellant to pay Rs.7,78,050/- with 6% interest per annum Patna High Court MA No.223 of 2022(3) dt.15-09-2025 2/2 from the date of filing of the case alongwith Rs.15,000/-for the funeral expenses and Rs.15,000/- for the loss of estate with liberty compensation amount to realize the with condition if insurance company find any defect in documents with regard to the vehicle as per the policy condition from the opposite party/respondent owner of the offending vehicle.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition. 4. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The statutory amount if any, has to be returned to the concerned company. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U