Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40318 (DEL)

MOHAMMAD HANIF v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS

W.P.(C)/15069/2025 · 2025-09-26

Mini Pushkarna

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15069/2025 & CM APPL. 63360/2025 MOHAMMAD HANIF .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kr. Mishra, Mr. Swagata Gupta, Ms. Renu, Mr. Thathagat Thakur and Mr. Fareed Uddin, Advs. Mob: 8013313825 versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. .....RespondentS Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar Khanna, Adv. for R-MCD Mob: 9891081919 Email: vinodkhanna_24@rediffmail.com CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA O R D E R % 09.10.2025 1. The present application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), for clarification of the final judgment dated 26 CM APPL. 63360/2025 th 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide judgment dated 26 September, 2025, passed by this Court. th September, 2025, this Court has granted time to the petitioner herein to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“ATMCD”), within a period of four weeks. There is further direction that the property of the petitioner shall be temporarily de- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/10/2025 at 17:14:10 sealed, forthwith. 3. It is submitted that despite the aforesaid direction, the property of the petitioner has not been de-sealed. 4. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) submits that the property has not been de- sealed for the reason that the appeal is yet to be filed by the petitioner before the ATMCD. 5. Responding to the same, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the appeal is ready and that the same shall be filed, expeditiously, within the time granted by this Court. 6. Accordingly, the MCD is directed to forthwith de-seal the premises in question. However, it is clarified that in case, the petitioner does not file appeal before the ATMCD, within the time as granted by this Court, vide order dated 26th 7. With the aforesaid clarification, the present application is accordingly disposed of. September, 2025, the MCD shall be at liberty to re-seal the premises in question, after expiry of the said period, as granted by this Court. MINI PUSHKARNA, J OCTOBER 9, 2025/SK This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/10/2025 at 17:14:10