Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40317 (PNJ)

MS SHIV GRIT UDHYOG THROUGH ITS PROPRIETORS AND PARTNER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/9138/2025 · 2025-04-01

Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-9138-2025 (O&M) 129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA M/s Shiv Grit Udhyog State of Haryana CORAM: HON HON Present:- Dr. Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate and Mr. Nitin Verma, Advocate SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ the nature of measuring 4050.393 square meters situated in Dhauj crushing zone Faridabad into industrial plot, in compliance 16) sent by the Administrator, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran to respondent No.3. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner may be granted liberty to grievance, to respondent No.3 3. On Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana for the respondent 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH M/s Shiv Grit Udhyog through its proprietors and partners versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Dr. Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate and Mr. Nitin Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia the nature of Mandamus directing respondent measuring 4050.393 square meters situated in Dhauj crushing zone Faridabad industrial plot, in compliance of the letter dated 17.03.2020 (Annexure P sent by the Administrator, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran to respondent At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner may be granted liberty to move a representat , to respondent No.3 and the same be decided, expeditiously. On the other hand, on advance service of Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana for the respondent – State, and Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Saanvi Singla, 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9138-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: April 01, 2025 through its proprietors and partners ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR Dr. Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate and for the petitioner. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ in respondent No.3 to convert plot No.46, measuring 4050.393 square meters situated in Dhauj crushing zone Faridabad of the letter dated 17.03.2020 (Annexure P- sent by the Administrator, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran to respondent At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the move a representation, for redressal of its and the same be decided, expeditiously. service of copy of petition, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Saanvi Singla, 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s in convert plot No.46, measuring 4050.393 square meters situated in Dhauj crushing zone Faridabad - sent by the Administrator, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran to respondent the its Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Saanvi Singla, MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.05 12:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-9138-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 Advocate and Ms. Sharni Dadhwal, Advocate for the respondent – HSVP appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He does not oppose the prayer of the petitioner and submits that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent No.3 in case a representation is moved and respondent No.3 shall take decision either way, on such representation. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a representation, for redressal of its grievance, before respondent No.3. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, then the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law, by respondent No.3 preferably within a period of 04 weeks from the date of filing of such representation. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE April 01, 2025 komal/mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.05 12:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment