Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40314 (AP)

Smt.U.Chandrakala, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/40423/2018 · 2025-12-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010838632018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 40423/2018 Between: 1. SMT.U.CHANDRAKALA,, W/O A.SURESH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC- JUNIOR ADVOCATE, R/O FLAT NO.414, AL BLOCK, SILVER SPRING APARTMENT, MODI BUILDERS, QUTBULLAPUR, CHINTAL, MEDCHAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RURAL POLICE STATION, KOTHAPETA, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. MR VENUGOPAL, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER OCC- SUB INSPECTOR, KURNOOL RURAL POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. MR A SURESH REDDY, S/O A.VENKAT REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC- RPF POLICE CONSTABLE, R/O FLAT NO.505, SUCHENDRA APARTMENT, NEAR GOOD SHEPARD SCHOOL, BALAJI NAGAR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. MR K VIKRAM KUMAR REDDY, S/O LATE K.GANDHI REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O NERAWADA, NEAR RGM COLLEGE, NANDHYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action 2 of the respondents No. 3 and 4 in summoning the petitioner to the Police Station under the guise of enquiry and indulging in verbal abuse without taking the complaint of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to cause enquiry into the verbal abuse by the respondent No. 4 on 18.10.2018 at Rural Police Station, Kothapeta, Kurnool District and take appropriate action against him and further interdict the 4th respondent for not taking appropriate action upon the complaint of the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction to the respondent No.2 to conduct enquiry into the verbal abuse by the respondent No. 4 on 18.10.2018 at Rural Police Station, Kothapeta, Kurnool District by directing the respondent No.3 to register FIR against the Respondent Nos. 5 84 6 in pursuance of the petitioner complaint dated 13-10-2018 forthwith in the interest of justice pending disposal of the Writ Petition in interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D JYOTHI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.40423 of 2018 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even on earlier occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondent Nos.1 to 3, is in attendance. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 4. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 4th December, 2025 cbn 4 74 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.40423 of 2018 4th December, 2025 cbn