- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28839 RPFC No. 28 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV. PET FAMILY COURT NO. 28 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI.SUDHIR V., AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS S/O LATE VITTAL RAO RESIDING AT NO.51 4TH CROSS ‘D’ STREET RAMACHANDRA LAYOUT KARIYANNAPALYA ST. THOMAS TOWN POST BANGALORE-560 084. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VASANTHA LAKSHMI H.V., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: SMT. V. RENUKA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS W/O SRI SUDHIR V., D/O SRI VENUGOPAL PRESENTLY R/AT NO.988 6TH CROSS, SAMPAGI RAMAIAH BLOCK AMBEDKAR NAGAR, DEVARAJEEVANAHALLI BANGALORE-560 045. …RESPONDENT THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED 10.12.2021 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.No.445/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28839 RPFC No. 28 of 2022 ORAL ORDER This RPFC is of the year 2022. This matter was listed before this Court on 09.02.2022, 18.10.2022, 10.11.2022, 03.08.2023 and on 23.07.2025. On 18.10.2022 and 10.11.2022, this Court had granted time to comply with the office objections and on the other three occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. When the matter came up on 23.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. For giving an opportunity to the petitioner, the matter was adjourned and it was directed to be listed under the caption ‘dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4