Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40311 (RAJ)

MAHENDRA KUMAR SUMAN S/O SHANKAR LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15555/2025 · 2025-10-13

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41659] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15555/2025 Mahendra Kumar Suman S/o Shankar Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Sarola Kalan, Tehsil Khanpur, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education (Headquarter), Baran. 4. The District Election Officer (Collector), Baran. 5. The Election Registration Officer (Sdm), Anta, District Baran. ----Respondents Connected with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15557/2025 Jogendra Koli S/o Bhagat Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Vpo Silor, Tehsil And District Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education (Headquarter), Baran. 4. The District Election Officer (Collector), Baran. 5. The Election Registration Officer (Sdm), Anta, District Baran. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15574/2025 Rohit Kumar Malav S/o Rajendra Kumar Malav, Aged About [2025:RJ-JP:41659] (2 of 3) [CW-15555/2025] 26 Years, R/o Vpo Setkolu, Tehsil Chhipabarod, District Baran, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Sanskrit Education, Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Divisional Sanskrit Education Officer, Sanskrit Education Division, Kota. 4. The District Election Officer (Collector), Baran. 5. The Election Registration Officer (Sdm), Anta, District Baran. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/10/2025 1. Since, all these writ petitions involve a common question of law and fact, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner(s) while referring order dated 04.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13367/2025 (Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.), order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14524/2025 (Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and S.B. CWP No.15328/2025 Santara Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (order dated 07.10.2025) and submits that the controversy raised [2025:RJ-JP:41659] (3 of 3) [CW-15555/2025] herein is squarely covered by judgment delivered by a Co-ordinate bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12975/2025) and these writ petitions be disposed of. 3. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for petitioners and on perusal of judgment in case of Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors (supra), Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan (supra) and Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), these writ petitions may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner(s) to file a fresh representation within a period of 4 weeks from today. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner(s) are given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of judgment in case of Ten Singh (Supra). After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner(s) either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner(s) have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioner(s) are still aggrieved, they have right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petitions with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /90, 91 and 93