Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40310 (AP)

CHAPPIDI RAVIDRA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/28191/2025 · 2025-10-27

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010541512025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28191/2025 Between: 1. CHAPPIDI RAVIDRA, S/O. SOMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC COOLIE, R/O. SC COLONY, RAJUPALEM VILLAGE, KOTHAPATNAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTHAPATNAM POLICE STATION, KOTHAPATNAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not registering the FIR against the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated 26.03.2025 which is highly illegally, arbitrary and violation of article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to file 2 FIR against the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated 26.03.2025 on the file of the Respondent Police Station and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the representation submitted by the Petitioner dated 26.03.2025 and 28.03.2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Yadlapalli Sitharamanjaneyulu Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28191 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not registering the FIR against the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated 26.03.2025 which is highly illegally, arbitrary and violation of article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to file FIR against the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated 26.03.2025 on the file of the Respondent Police Station and pass…” 2. Heard Sri Yadlapalli Sitharamanjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint of the petitioner, the police have conducted preliminary enquiry. During the course of enquiry, it is found that no case is made out for registration of an FIR. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 28.10.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28191 of 2025 Dated.28.10.2025 UPS 206