IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.578 of 2025 ------ Pintu Kumar Das @ Pintu das, Aged about – 42 years, S/o- Bajo Das, R/o- Village and P.O.- Birne, P.S.- Gawan, District- Giridih, State Jharkhand, 815313 .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Uttam Kr. Das, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-27-01-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Hirodih P.S. Case No.122 of 2024 instituted under Sections 191(2)/127(1)/352/115(2)/329(4)/118(1)/ 109/303(2)/351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, being the member of an unlawful assembly, in prosecution of common object of the assembly, attempted to murder the son of the informant- Ranjit Das. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-15 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that no injury report could be produced by the victim as yet. It is also submitted that the allegation of the theft has been made as an ornamental allegation to make the offence serious and the petitioner has been implicated in this case, only because he is a relative of the co-accused namely Usha Devi. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.5,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Giridih in connection with Hirodih P.S. Case No.122 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/