$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)-IPD 34/2024 & CM 116/2024 PT TECH, LLC .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ranjan Narula, Mr. Shakti Nair & Mr. Parth Bajaj, Advocates. versus THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS, DESIGNS AND TRADEMARKS AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC along with Mr. Mayank Sansanwal & Mr. Om Ram, Advocates for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 26.09.2025 1. Vide order dated 25.07.2025, the learned CGSC appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 1 requested for time to determine whether the counter statement was served upon the Petitioner inadvertently. 2. The learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1, on instructions, submits that the counter statement was served upon the Petitioner inadvertently. 3. In view of the statement made on behalf of Respondent No. 1, no further orders are required to be passed in this Petition. 4. Accordingly, the Petition stands disposed of. Pending Application stands disposed of. 5. A copy of this order shall be sent by the Registry of this Court to the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2025 at 12:52:57 Trade Marks Registry at the email addresses - cgoffice.in@gov.in and llc- ipo@gov.in, for information and necessary action. TEJAS KARIA, J SEPTEMBER 26, 2025/ ‘A’ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2025 at 12:52:57