[2025:JHHC:35688] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.1092 of 2025 ------ 1. Manjula Sinha wife of Sri Arun Kumar Sinha, aged about 74 years, 2. Abhijeet Kumar son of Sri Arun Kumar Sinha, aged about 52 years, 3. Abhimeet Kumar son of Sri Arun Kumar Sinha, aged about 49 years, All resident of Mouza Pundag, P.O.- Jagannathpur, P.S.- Jagannathpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Additional Secretary, Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur Division, Kutchery Road, Ranchi, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. The Additional Collector, Ranchi, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. The Circle Officer, Ratu Circle (at present Nagri Circle), at Nagri, P.O.- Nagri, P.S.- Nagri, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Jorong Jedan Sanga, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suresh Kumar, SC (L&C) II ------ Order No:-04 Dated:-28-11-2025 Heard the parties. This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer for restoration of W.P. (C) No.4997 of 2015 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 30.07.2025 passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that W.P. (C) No.4997 of 2015 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 30.07.2025 passed by this Court to file the proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/- by the petitioners with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA). It is next submitted that due to inadvertence, the said proof could not be filed within the stipulated time which resulted in dismissal of the said W.P. (C) No.4997 of 2015 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 30.07.2025 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 30.07.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said W.P. (C) No.4997 of 2015 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the W.P. (C) No.4997 of 2015 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, W.P. (C) No.4997 of 2015 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list W.P. (C) No.4997 of 2015 before the concerned Bench after a week. This civil miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 28.11.2025-Animesh/