1 2025:CGHC:37899 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8904 of 2019 1 - Dr. A.L. Jawalkar S/o Shri R.L. Jawalkar Aged About 59 Years Working As Medical Officer, Posted At Community Health Center, Birganv, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. R/o Sec. 2 , Qr. No . 25 Ekta Nagar P.S. Gudhiyari, Raipur , Tah. And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director Health Services Chhattisgarh Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate For State : Mr. Amandeep Singh Panel Lawyer. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 01/08/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to grant Senior pay scale from 01/01/2006 and Pravar Shreni Vetanman from 01/01/2013. 1st and 2nd RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2025.08.01 16:49:45 +0530 2 kramonnati, promotion with benefits to the petitioner with all consequential benefit from the date of his actual entitlement. 10.2 Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. 10.3 Any other relief, which may be deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as per instructions, the order has been passed by the competent authority for redressal of grievance of the petitioner, therefore, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition, if occasion arises. 3. Learned counsel for the State-respondent/s has no objection to allow the prayer of counsel for the petitioner. 4. On due consideration, prayer is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw instant petition. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. No orders as to cost(s). 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar