1 APHC010476412009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3563] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL Nos.105 OF 2009, 95 OF 2010 AND 395 OF 2012 FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 105/2009 Between: 1. SMT.KARRI SHIREESHA, W/O.KARRI RAJU PATRUDU, HINDU C/O.DANNINA TATA RAO, D.NO.44-4-2, NEAR GANESH TEMPLE, ARCHE, THATICHETKAPALEM, ...APPELLANT AND 1. SRI KARRI RAJU PATRUDU, S/o.Nooka Raju, Hindu R/o.D.No.44-7- 1/5, Ganesh Nagar, Thatichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against ordersthe impugned order and decree are liable to be set aside IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 210 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant interim injunction restraining the respondent from marrying any other person in pursuance of the decree of divorce in OP No.399/2007 granted by the Family Court, Visakhapatnam dated 05.02.2009 pending disposal of the appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 1. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent: 1. T S VENKATARAMANA 2 FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 95/2010 Between: 1. SMT. KARRI SHIREESHA, W/O KARRI RAJU PATRUDU C/O DANNINA TATA RAO D.NO.44-4-2, NEAR GANESH TEMPLE ...APPELLANT AND 1. SRI KARRI RAJU PATRUDU, S/o Nooka Raju R/o D.No.44-7-1/5, Ganesh nagar, Thatichetlapalem, ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 292 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 6 days in filing the appeal against OP.NO. 41 of 2008 IA NO: 2 OF 2009(FCAMP 293 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense with filing of the certified copy of the common order as copy is filed herewith and certified copy was filed in FCA.No. of 2009 against OP.NO. 399 of 2007 Counsel for the Appellant: 1. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. T S VENKATARAMANA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 395/2012 Between: 1. SMT. KARRI SHIREESHA, W/O.KARRI RAJU PATRUDU, HINDU C/O.DANNINA TATA RAO, D.NO.44-4-2, NEAR GANESH TEMPLE, ARCHE, THATICHETLAPALEM, ...APPELLANT AND 3 1. SRI KARRI RAJU PATRUDU, S/o.Nooka Raju, Hindu R/o.D.No.44-7- 1/5, Ganesh NAgar, Tahatichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 270 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 3 days in filing the appeal against OP.NO. 1056 of 2007 IA NO: 2 OF 2009(FCAMP 271 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense with filing of the certified copy of the common order as Xerox copy is filed herein with and certified copy was filed in FCA.No. of 2009 agianst OP.NO. 399/2007 Counsel for the Appellant: 1. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent: 1. T S VENKATARAMANA The Court made the following: 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL Nos.105 OF 2009, 95 OF 2010 AND 395 OF 2012 COMMON JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Mr. A.S.C.Bose, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he received information from his clients requesting him to withdraw the appeals filed by them, which are pending before this Court. He has placed a copy of letter, dated 11.12.2025 sent by the appellant to the learned counsel for the appellant. He has also placed a copy of the letter, dated 24.12.2025, wherein he requested the Registry to list these matters for withdrawal. These two (02) letters are placed on record. 2. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the appellant, permission is granted to withdraw these appeals. 3. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. 5 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND ______________________________ JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 24/12/2025 SCS 6 67 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL Nos.105 OF 2009, 95 OF 2010 AND 395 OF 2012 Date: 24.12.2025 SCS