Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40297 (RAJ)

OM PRAKASH S/O SHRI NAURAT MAL BHAT v. THE CHIEF PROTECTION COMMISSIONER

WRW/131/2025 · 2025-10-08

Sameer Jain

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40912] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 131/2025 Om Prakash S/o Shri Naurat Mal Bhat, Mewari Gate Near Sain Ka Takiya, Beawar, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Chief Protection Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, North Western Railway, Headquarter Off, Jaipur Raj. 2. The Chair Person/ Incharge, Screening Committee, Railway Protection Force (Cost. Band) North Western Railway, Headquarter Office, Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tushar Panwar with Mr. Rohit Kumar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 08/10/2025 1. Present review petition has been filed against the order dated 13.02.2025 passed by this Court in SBCWP No.13467/2010, whereby writ petition has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed that the vacancy in question pertains to the year 2006 and at that relevant time, no fresh vacancies arose, and that the recruitment process was already culminated; however, it is urged that the matter requires consideration for its peculiar facts as the reason for expansion was conviction, which was not disclosed. 3. Heard and considered the contentions made by the learned counsel and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:40912] (2 of 2) [WRW-131/2025] 4. Considering the fact that the present review petition is filed in a guise of an appeal and no substantial material has been placed on record, to satisfy the Court qua the contentions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner; and the fact that the petitioners have an alternate efficacious remedy as to prefer an appeal, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition. 5. Therefore, no interference is called for in the review petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /366