VISHAL YADAV SON OF SHRI ASHOK KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8184/2025 · 2025-08-05
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40294 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40294 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:30055] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8184/2025 Vishal Yadav Son Of Shri Ashok Kumar Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o House No. 01, Shri Krishna Colony 60 Feet Road, Police Station N.e.b. District Alwar (Raj.) ( At Present Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP Mr. Ashok Choudhary on behalf of Mr. Deepak Chauhan for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 05/08/2025
1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the petitioner-accused Vishal Yadav in FIR No.146/2025 dated 18.04.2025 registered at P.S. NEB Alwar District - Alwar, whereby the petitioner-accused has charged under Section/s 420, 406 and 506 IPC (later on for the offence under Sections under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120-B of IPC).
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main accused Ashok Kumar was already granted bail on 16.05.2025 by the trial Court and the case of the present petitioner is even on better footing. He submits that as per the report registered by complainant they were in contact with main accused Ashok Kumar who was already granted
[2025:RJ-JP:30055] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8184/2025] bail and not with the present petitioner. He further submits that this report was registered after a delay of two years and they kept silent for two years despite their investment in share market but once they started losing money, they have filed a police case against them.
3. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant.
4.
Learned counsel for the complainant submits that they have already moved the bail cancellation application for Ashok Kumar but the same is pending before the Court concerned. He further submits that the present petitioner is the main accused and he is responsible for entire diversion of funds into the account of Priti Yadav (sister of accused).
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the report received from concerned police station along with material placed on record by both the parties.
6. On basis of report filed by complainant, after registration the matter was investigated and accused Ashok Kumar was arrested, who was released on bail on 16.05.2025 by learned trial Court.
7. We have considered detailed report submitted by PS NEB Alwar which indicate that Ashok Kumar, Priyanka Yadav and Vishal Yadav were involved in cheating and breach of trust. One of the co-accused person Ashok Kumar was already released on bail by learned trial Court. Thus, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without
[2025:RJ-JP:30055] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8184/2025] expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner-accused.
8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of petitioner- accused is hereby allowed and the petitioner-accused Vishal Yadav Son Of Shri Ashok Kumar Yadav, is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of ₹25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The petitioner-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The petitioner-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the petitioner-accused shall be liable to be cancelled.
9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/158