Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40283 (MAD)

S.MUTHUKUMAR v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/12702/2025 · 2025-04-08

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.12702 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.12702 of 2025 1. S.MUTHUKUMAR 2. V.KOKILA 3. R.TAMILSELVI 4. M.UMAKANDHAN 5. M.RADHA MANALAN 6. P.MURUGAIYA 7. R.KMALANATHAN 8. A.VIJAYARAJA 9. JANAKI AMMAL 10. MAHESWARAN 11. G.NAGARATHINAM 12. R.VASUGI 13. D.RAJAMANICKAM 14. K.NEELAMEGAM ... Petitioner Vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMIL NADU URBAN HABITAT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, KAMARAJAR SALAI, CHENNAI-600 005. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose the representation dated 12.08.2024 and consequently issue allotment orders for the petitioners at Kizhkathirpur Planning Scheme For Petitioner : Mr.D.Bharathy 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12702 of 2025 For Respondent : Mr.K.Indhumathy Venkatesh ORDER The prayer in the writ petition is to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 12.08.2024. 2. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and perusing the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition as well as the representation, it appears that the petitioner prays for preferential allotment under the quota for repatriates from Sri Lanka/Myanmar. 3. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that there is no vacancy in Kizhkathirpur tenements and there are only vacancies in Salamangalam in Padappai Taluk. It may be so, but it is for the respondent to consider the representation in accordance with the law. If any other tenement is to be offered along with the conditions as per the rules of the respondent, they can offer it to the petitioner as well. If the petitioner is offered in writing, thereafter the petitioner can take a call. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12702 of 2025 4. In view thereof, the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 12.08.2024 in accordance with the law and pass orders thereon. If they are willing to accommodate the petitioners in any other tenement, they can inform the petitioners in writing, with such conditions as may apply. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the web copy of the order. 5. In view thereof, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 08.04.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsl To THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMIL NADU URBAN HABITAT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, KAMARAJAR SALAI, CHENNAI-600 005. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12702 of 2025 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. nsl W.P.No.12702 of 2025 08.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis