- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26600 WP No. 507 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 507 OF 2021 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. JANAKAMMA W/O LATE SHIVALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT THIRTHAPPA CAMP, MATTUR TALUK AND DISTRICT, SHIVAMOGGA PIN-577 203. 2. H.S. UMESH S/O H.S. THIRTHA LINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, GOVERNMENT SCHOOL TEACHER, RESIDING AT BASAVESHVAR P U COLLEGE, HOSAKOPPA, GANDHI NAGAR, 5TH CROSS, B BLOCK, SHIVAMOGGA PIN-577 201. 3. H.D. SRINIVAS S/O LATE DHATTATRI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT KURUBAR PALA, O.T. ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT PIN-577 201. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26600 WP No. 507 of 2021 SHIVAMOGGA SUB-DIVISION, DEPARTMENTAL ARBITRATOR, SHIVAMOGGA PIN-577 201. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR THE SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, LTD. SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT PIN-577 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARISH A.S., AGA FOR R1; SRI. DAYANAND S PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO-(I) QUASH THE ORDER DATED 20.03.2020 IN APPEAL NO.149/2017 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: “(i) Writ of Certiorari quashing the order dated 20-03- 2020 in Appeal No 149/2017 passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal at Bengaluru certified copy of which is produced at Annexure A. (ii) Writ of certiorari quashing the award dated 29-03- 2016 in Dispute No: J.R.D.D.I.S. 181/2015-16 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26600 WP No. 507 of 2021 passed by the 1st respondent certified copy of which is produced at Annexure B. (iii) Any other writs or directions to meet the ends of justice.” 2. The submission of learned counsel for respondent No.2 is that though One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal submitted by the petitioner was accepted by respondent No.2 for a sum of Rs.42 lakhs, the petitioner did not make payment thereafter. If that be the case, there is no requirement to consider any other aspect since there is an admission of the liability while submitting OTS proposal. 3. The OTS proposal not being complied with by the petitioner, the petition stands dismissed. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18